Afternoon Tea Mysteries [Vol Three] Page 22

  “George, Alfred, and Leighton? What possible interest can you have in them? Rich fellows, spend thrifts, every one of them. What have they been up to that you should rout me up at this hour—”

  For reply I opened out the morning paper which I had been careful to bring along.

  “See here!” I cried: “‘Archibald Gillespie, the well-known broker, died suddenly last night, from the effects of some drug mysteriously administered.’” I was reading rapidly, anxious to see what kind of a story the reporters had made of it. “‘He had been ill for some weeks back, but seemed perfectly restored up to half-past nine o’clock last evening, when he fell and died without warning, in the small room known as his den. A bottle of chloral was found on the mantel but there is no proof that he took any of it. Indeed, his symptoms were such that the action of a much more violent drug is suspected. His little grandchild was a witness to his last moments.’ George, Leighton, and Alfred are now more than rich fellows. They are rich men,” I suggested, relieved that my name had not appeared in the headlines.

  “They need to be,” was the short reply. “One of them at least stood in great need of money.”

  “Which?” I asked, with an odd sensation of choking in my throat.

  “George. He’s about played out, as I take it. To my certain knowledge he has lost in unfortunate bets thirty thousand dollars since summer set in. He has a mania for betting and card-playing, and as his father had little patience with vices of this nature, their relations of late have been more than strained. But he’s a mighty big-hearted fellow for all that, and a great favourite with the men who don’t play with him. I heard he was going to be married. That and this sudden windfall may set him straight again. He’s a handsome fellow; did you ever meet him?”

  “Once,” I acknowledged. Then with an effort of which I was more or less ashamed, I asked the name of the girl who was willing to take such a well-known spendthrift for a husband.

  Sam did not seem to be as well posted on this point as on some others.

  “I have heard her name,” he admitted. “Some cousin, who lives in the same house with him. The old gentleman fancied her so much, he promised to give a big fortune to the son who married her. It seems that George is likely to be the lucky one. Strange, what odd things come up in families.”

  “There is another brother—Alfred, I think they call him.”

  “Oh, Alph! He’s a deuced handsome chap, too, but not such a universal favourite as George. More moral though. I think his sole vice is an inordinate love of doing nothing. I have known him to lie out half the night on a club-divan, saying nothing, doing nothing, not even smoking. I have sometimes wondered if he ate opium on the sly. Life would be stupid as he spends it, if dreams did not take the place of the pleasant realities he scorns.”

  I must have shown my amazement. This was not the Alfred Gillespie I had met the night before.

  “I have heard that everything was not quite smooth with him. I know I haven’t seen him around lately, crushing pillows and making us all look vulgar in contrast to his calm and almost insulting impassibility. I wonder what he will do with the three or four millions which will fall to his share.”

  “Marry,” I suggested, fillipping a fly from my coat-sleeve.

  “He? Alph? I don’t believe he could hold himself erect long enough to go through the ceremony. Be sides, it would be such a bore. That’s my idea of Alph.”

  It was not mine. Either he had greatly changed, or Sam Underhill’s knowledge of him was of the most superficial character. As I wavered between these two conclusions I began to experience a vague sensation of dread. If love could effect such a transformation in so unlikely a subject as the man we were discussing, what might it not effect in an ardent nature like my own?

  I hastened to change the subject.

  “The third brother is already married, I believe.”

  “Leighton? Oh, he’s a widower; has been a widower for years. He was unfortunate in the marriage he made. After the first year no one ever saw young Mrs. Gillespie in public. I don’t think the old gentleman ever forgave him that match.”

  “What was the trouble? He seems to have a dear little girl. I saw her when I saw her uncle.”

  “Oh, the child. She’s well enough, but the mother was—well, we will be charitable and say erratic. Common stock, I’ve heard. No mate at all for a man like him. Not that he’s any too good either for all his hypocritical ways. I have no use for Leighton. I cannot abide so-called philanthropic men whose noses are always in the gutter. He’s a sneak, is Leighton, and so inconsistent. One day you hear of him presiding at some charity meeting; the next night you find him behind the scenes at a variety theatre. And as for money—not one of Mr. Gillespie’s sons spends so much. He has just drained the old man’s purse, or so I’ve heard; and when asked to give an account of himself mentions his charities and many schemes of benevolence—as if the old man himself didn’t spend thousands in just such lines.”

  “He doesn’t look like a prig,” I ventured.

  “Oh, he looks well enough. But there’s something wrong about the man. His own folks acknowledge it; something shameful, furtive; something which will not bear the light. None of those boys are chips of the old block. Let’s see the paper. What are you holding it off for? Anything more about Mr. Gillespie’s death? Do they call it suicide? That would be a sad ending to such a successful life.”

  “One question first. Was Mr. Gillespie a good man?”

  “He was rich; yet had few if any calumniators.”

  I handed him the paper. There were some startling lines below those I had read out so glibly.

  “They do not stop at suicide,” I remarked; “murder is suggested. The drug was not administered by himself.”

  “Oh!” protested Sam, running his eye over the lines that were destined to startle all New York that morning. “This won’t do! None of those boys are bad enough for that, not even Leighton.”

  “You dislike Leighton,” I remarked.

  He did not reply; he had just come upon my name in the article he was reading.

  “Look here!” he cried, “you’re a close one. How came you to be mixed up with the affair? I see your name here.”

  “Read!”

  He complied with an eagerness which I suppose but faintly mirrored that of half the Tribune’s readers that morning. What he read, I leave to your imagination, merely premising that no new facts had come to light since my departure from the house and the printing of the paper. When he had finished, he be stowed upon me a long and scrutinising look. “This knocks me out,” said he, with more force than elegance. “I would never have believed it, never, of any of these men.” Then with a sudden change quite characteristic, he ejaculated, “It was a rum chance for you, Arthur. How did you like it?”

  I refused to discuss this side of the question. I was afraid of disclosing what had become the inner most secret of my heart.

  He did not notice my reticence—this, too, was like him but remarked with visible reluctance:

  “The weight of evidence seems to be against Alph. Poor Alph! So this is the result of those long, unbroken hours of silent dreaming! I shall never trust a lazy man again. When they do bestir them selves—”

  “He has not been arrested yet,” I interjected dryly. “Till the police show absolute belief in his guilt, I for one shall hold my tongue.”

  “Poor Alph!” was all the reply I received.

  XIII. Indications

  THESE concluding words of Sam Underhill show the trend of public opinion at this time. But I was not swayed by the general prejudice, nor. to all appearance, were the police. Though enough poison was found in Mr. Gillespie’s remains to have caused the death of any ordinary man in fifteen minutes, no arrests were made, nor was Mr. Gillespie’s favourite son subjected to any closer surveillance than the other members of this once highly respected family.

  Meanwhile, the papers were filled with gossip about the case, which was now openly regarded as
one of murder. In one column I read a semi-humorous, semi-serious account of how George Gillespie actually once won a bet in face of all odds and to the confounding of those who trusted in his invariable ill-luck; and in another how Leighton had worn out his father’s patience by a most persistent association with the most degraded classes, an association which led him into all sorts of extravagances. As a sample of these, and to show how entirely his follies differed from those of his elder brother, he has been known to order breakfast at a restaurant and disappear in the wake of a Salvation Army procession before the meal could be served. They never knew at home when to expect him in, or at what moment he might leave the family circle. He was so restless, he rarely sat an evening out in any one place. Without any apparent reason, he would often leave in the midst of concert, sermon, or lecture, and has been known more than once to dash away from a theatrical performance as if his life depended upon his reaching the open air. And he never expected to be criticised or questioned. If he were, he found some apology to suit the occasion; but the apology was forced, and the person who called it forth rarely repeated the offence.

  Only a small paragraph was devoted to Alfred. In it his temporary engagement to Miss Saxton of Baltimore was mentioned, and a somewhat cruel account given of the way he jilted this young lady on his return to the city. As this was coincident with the arrival of Hope at her uncle’s house, I needed no further explanation of his fickleness.

  All this gossip about people in whom I had come to take so deep an interest both worried and unsettled me; and I found myself looking forward with mingled dread and expectation to the public inquiry, which I had every reason to hope would separate some of these threads, in the network of which my own heart had become so unfortunately entangled.

  It had been called for Thursday, and when that day came I was one of the first to appear upon the scene. Not a word of what passed escaped me; not a look nor a sign. Miss Meredith, who entered on the arm of Leighton, wore a veil thick enough to conceal her features. But I did not need to pierce that veil to imagine the expression of anxiety and distress she thus concealed from the crowd. George, who had resumed his usual manner, sat, conspicuous in height and good looks, among a group of witnesses, some of whom I knew and some not. Dr. Bennett sat at my side, and had so little to say that I did not attempt to disturb him, having respect for the grief with which he regarded the untimely end of his life long friend and patient.

  The first witness was myself.

  As my testimony contained nothing which has not been already very fully related in these pages, I will pass over this portion of the scene, with the single remark that in the course of my whole examination, which was a lengthy and exhaustive one, I allowed no expression to escape me likely to prejudice the minds of those about me against any one of Mr. Gillespie’s sons. For it was apparent, before I had been upon the stand ten minutes, that an effort was being made to fix the crime on Alfred; and what surety could I have that this result would not plunge a barbed arrow into the breast of her about whom my fancy had drawn its magic circle? As I sat down, I glanced her way, and it seemed to me there was meaning in the slight acknowledgment she made me with her ungloved hand. But what meaning?

  The inquiry thus being opened, and curiosity roused as to the motive which led Mr. Gillespie to summon a stranger to his side at a moment so vital and under circumstances seemingly calling for the ministrations of those nearest and dearest to him, various experts and physicians were called to prove that his death had not been caused by disease, but by the action of prussic acid on a sufficiently healthy system. With the establishment of this fact the morning’s inquiry closed.

  As Miss Meredith was likely to be the first witness called at the afternoon session, I felt it my duty as her lawyer to approach her at this time with the following question, quite customary under the circumstances:

  “Miss Meredith,” said I, “you will probably soon be subjected to a searching inquiry by the coroner. May I ask if there is any special point or topic concerning which you would prefer to keep silence? If so, I can insist upon your privilege.”

  The look of mingled surprise and indignation with which she regarded me was a sufficient answer in itself. Yet she chose to say, and say coldly, after a moment of reflection:

  “I have nothing to conceal. He can ask no question I shall not be perfectly willing to answer.

  Abashed by the construction she had put upon my words, as well as greatly hurt by her manner, I bowed and drew off. Evidently she had felt her candour impugned and her innocence questioned, and, in her ignorance of legal proceedings, thought she had only to speak the truth to sustain herself in my eyes and in those of the crowd assembled to hear her.

  This sort of self-confidence is common in witnesses, especially in such as are more conscious of their integrity than of the pitfalls underlying the simplest inquiry; and however much I might deplore her short-sightedness and wish that she had better understood both myself and her own position, it was plain that, in the light of what had just passed between us, all interference on my part would be regarded by her as an insult, and that I would be expected to keep silence under all circumstances, let the consequences be what they would.

  It was an outlook far from agreeable either for the lawyer or lover, and the recess which now ensued was passed by me in a state of dread of which she in her inexperience had little idea.

  Upon the reseating of the jury, her name, just as I had anticipated, was the first one called.

  The emotions with which I saw her rise and throw aside her veil under the concentrated gaze of the unsympathetic crowd convened to hear her testimony, first revealed to me the absoluteness of her hold upon me; and when I heard the buzz of admiration which followed the disclosure of her features, I was conscious of colouring so deeply that I feared my secret would become the common property of the crowd. But the spell created by her beauty still held, and all regards remained fixed upon her countenance, now eloquent with feelings which for the moment were shared by all who looked upon her.

  Her voice when she spoke deepened the effect of her presence. It was of that fine and resonant quality which awakens an echo in all sensitive hearts and carries conviction with it even to the most callous and prejudiced. It lost some of its power perhaps as the ear became accustomed to it; but to the very end of her testimony, I noted here and there persons who looked up every time she spoke, as if some inner chord responded to her tones—tones which, more than her face, conveyed the impression of a nature exceedingly deep and exquisitely sensitive.

  She, meantime, failed to realise the effect which her appearance had produced. She had been questioned, and was striving earnestly and conscientiously to do justice to her oath, and relate as circumstantially as possible what she knew of her uncle’s sudden death.

  This is what I heard her say:

  “I was my uncle’s typewriter. I assisted him often with his correspondence and was accustomed to go in and out of his study as if it were my own room. On this night, I had written several letters for him, and being tired had gone up-stairs for a little rest. But I was too anxious to be of assistance to him—his mail that evening was unusually large—to retire without one more effort to relieve him; so I went down again a little after ten. I had heard steps in the hall a few minutes before, and little Claire’s voice somewhere about the house, but I did not encounter anyone in going down, perhaps because I went by the way of the rear stairs, as I often do when I am in a hurry. Little, little did I imagine what was before me. When I reached my uncle’s door,—but you know what a terrible sight met me. There lay my kind—my good—”

  We all waited, our hearts in our mouths, but in a moment more she choked down her emotion and was ready to go on.

  “He was dead. I knew it at first glance, yet I raised no cry. I could not. I seemed in an instant to have become marble. I saw him lying at my feet and did not weep a tear. I did not even touch him. I merely staggered to the table at the side of which he had fallen, and mechan
ically, but with a stoppage of my heart’s action which made the instant one of untold horror to me, lifted the carriage of the type writer which he had evidently been using when struck with death, and looked to see what his last words had been. I had reason for believing that they would convey some warning to me or at least an explanation of his sudden death. And they did, or so I interpreted the isolated phrase I came upon at the end of the unfinished letter I found there. God knows I may have been mistaken as to what those five words meant, but I was so impressed with the belief that they were added there for my personal enlightenment that I reeled under the responsibility thus forced upon me, and, hardly conscious of what I was doing, tore off, with almost criminal haste, the portion containing these words, and fled with them out of the sight and reach of everyone in the house. It was a mad thing to do, and I speedily regretted the insane impulse which had actuated me, for I was very soon discovered in the remote spot to which I had fled, and the piece of paper was found, and—and—”

  How could she be expected to go on?

  “Have we that piece of paper here?” asked the coroner.

  It was produced, identified, and passed down to the jury.

  It was my opinion at the time, and is still, that she told her story thus fully in order to elude the questions which any apparent reticence on her part would assuredly have evoked. But, having reached this point, it seemed impossible for her to go farther. She drooped, not under the eyes of the crowd, but under the fixed gaze of her three cousins. Had she hoped for some signs of sympathy from them which she failed to receive, or, at least a partial recognition, on their part, of the suffering she was undergoing in the cause of truth and justice? If so, no such recognition came. George’s fine face showed anger and anger only; Leighton’s, a cold impassibility which might have passed for the stolidity of an utterly unfeeling man if his hands had not betrayed his inner restlessness and torment; while Alfred’s flashing eye and set lips made plain the fact that his emotions clung to his own position rather than to hers—as was natural, perhaps, with that slip of paper going the rounds of the jury, and calling up from that respect able body startled, uneasy, or menacing looks, according to the nature of the man examining it.